![](/uploads/1/2/5/8/125853059/700301035.jpg)
Summer 2017, Vol. 49, No. 2
Jan 21, 2006 The British lost 20 Cromwell tanks, 4 Fireflys, 3 light tanks, 3 scout cars and a half track. Almost single-handedly, Wittman, this most courageous and brilliant German tank commander, had destroyed the British advance around Villers-Bocage and forced the.
By James Worsham
Lt. Col. George S. Patton, Jr., next to a tank in France, July 1918. (Sgt. L. Rode, 111-SC-17592, RG 111)
As the American forces fought the German army in a World War I battle in September 1918, the commander of a brigade of infantrymen from the 42nd “Rainbow” Division encountered the commander of a U.S. tank brigade.
The two officers, who knew of each other but had never met, stopped to chat on a French battlefield for a few minutes.
An artillery barrage burst around them, sending infantrymen diving for cover. The two officers, however, stood out in the open, talking as they prepared for their next moves.
What each one said to the other is not certain, but what is not in dispute is that this is how Brig. Gen. Douglas MacArthur and Lt. Col. George S. Patton, Jr., first met. Today, they are famous for viewing themselves as almost bullet-proof, and on that day, just a few months before World War I ended, it seemed that they were.
The troops they were commanding were moving toward the French town of Essey, as part of the battle plan for the St. Mihiel offensive.
The overall plan they were part of of had been drawn up by a young officer whose extraordinary talent at planning, organizing, and administrative work kept him chained to a desk, the combat command he wanted so badly eluding him. Lt. Col. George C. Marshall, an aide to Gen. John J. Pershing, commander of the Allied Expeditionary Force in Europe, would never lead troops in combat.
The three officers—MacArthur, Patton, and Marshall—were experiencing on a small scale in 1918 what they would be doing a quarter-century later on a much grander scale in World War II.
Then, in World War II, Patton would be drilling into Nazi-held territories with his tanks. MacArthur would be leading his troops from island to island in the Pacific toward the Japanese homeland. And Marshall would be in Washington, D.C., far from Europe or the Pacific, creating military strategy and assisting the commander in chief, President Franklin D. Roosevelt.
Other American military figures who would lead U.S. forces in World War II were also gaining valuable experience on the battlefields of Europe, the waters of the Atlantic, and on the home front in a war that was supposed to make the world, as President Woodrow Wilson put it, “safe for democracy.”
Henry “Hap” Arnold
Capt. Henry 'Hap' Arnold. (111-RB-1048)
Henry “Hap” Arnold had been interested in airplanes since he received some pilot training by the Wright brothers. During the years leading up to and during World War I, Arnold was active in promoting the military use of airplanes, and in the process he overcame his own fear of flying.
When the United States entered the war in April 1917, Arnold asked for assignment to France but was told he was needed for duty at Army headquarters, where he was overseeing the expansion of what was then known as the “air service.” His star rose, even as he ruffled some feathers along the way, and by August 1917, he became the youngest full colonel in the Army.
He continued to school himself on all aspects of military aviation—from the production of planes to the training of pilots—and learned to navigate the Washington political jungle. By the beginning of the U.S. involvement in World War II, Arnold was head of the Army Air Corps. He was promoted to General of the Army (five stars) and after the war, when the U.S. Air Force was created, given the rank General of the Air Force, making him the only person to hold five-star rank in two services.
Dwight D. Eisenhower
Capt. Dwight D. Eisenhower at Camp Colt, Pennsylvania, 1918. (Eisenhower Library)
Dwight D. Eisenhower was a newly minted second lieutenant in 1915 and ready for combat and command when the United States joined World War I in 1917. But it was not to be.
Like George Marshall, he had shown skills at organizing and planning and never got a combat command in Europe in World War I; in fact, he never made it out of the country. He was even reprimanded for applying for overseas duty so often.
So Lieutenant Eisenhower had to settle for duty stateside. In early 1918, he took command of Camp Colt in Pennsylvania, the Army’s first training camp involving tanks. His first major problem was acquiring tanks to train with. Instead, he had the men work on internal combustion engines, while others learned telegraphy, a skill needed in Europe. To replicate riding a tank and using a machine gun or small-caliber cannons, he mounted the weapons on the back of flatbed trucks.
After a local businessman complained to his congressman about the behavior of some of the men of Camp Colt, Eisenhower told the lawmaker to go ahead: “Nothing would please me better than to be taken out of this job. I want to go overseas. If they take me out of here, maybe I can get there.” It didn’t work. Instead, he got a commendation letter for “safekeeping the welfare of his troops.”
Finally, however, he got his wish: orders to depart for France in mid-November 1918. But the war ended on November 11, 1918, and Eisenhower would stay stateside for the indefinite future.
Eisenhower would eventually get a command in Europe, and a big one—Supreme Commander, Allied Expeditionary Force, in Europe in World War II. That put him in charge of Operation Overlord, the D-day landing on the beaches of Normandy—the largest invasion in history—which succeeded in putting enough Allied troops in Europe to end the Nazis’ Third Reich within a year.
“Ike” came home a hero, a General of the Army (five stars), and eventually President of the United States.
![Commanders Commanders](/uploads/1/2/5/8/125853059/809498986.jpg)
William F. Halsey, Jr.
William F. Halsey, Jr.’s first assignment after graduating from the Naval Academy in 1904 was aboard the USS Kansas as part of the Great White Fleet. During World War I, Halsey was in the Atlantic, commanding torpedo boats and destroyers before getting command of the USS Shaw.
Most of the early part of he spent with torpedoes and torpedo boats, his specialty. Later, he would note that his career was mostly commanding destroyers and destroyer groups.
In 1934 he was offered command of the Saratoga, one of the Navy’s newest ships, on the condition that he go to flight school and be rated as an observer. He agreed, but insisted on training as a pilot, not just an observer, even though he was twice as old as the pilots then in training.In the Pacific during World War II, Halsey was given increasing responsibility for actions that would push the Japanese back to their homeland. On September 2, 1945, the Japanese signed the surrender document on the deck of his flagship, the USS Missouri. He became an Admiral of the Fleet (five stars, comparable to General of the Army) in late 1945.
The Navy’s big three map an overall campaign strategy against Japan at a meeting in Hawaii in October 1943: Adm. Chester Nimitz, commander in chief of the Pacific Fleet and Pacific Ocean areas; Adm. Ernest King, commander in chief in the Pacific; and Adm. William F. Halsey, Jr., commander of the South Pacific force and the South Pacific area. (80-G-43467)
Ernest King
When World War I began, King was in command of the destroyer USS Terry, which was involved with the U.S. occupation of Veracruz, Mexico, then moved over to the USS Cassin. During U.S. participation in World War I, he was on the staff of the commander in chief of the Atlantic Fleet, Vice Admiral Henry T. Mayo.
After World War I, King held several commands involving submarines and became a qualified naval aviator and chief of the Bureau of Aeronautics in the 1930s. During World War II, he became the only person to be both commander in chief, United States Fleet, and Chief of Naval Operations.
King retired after World War II, but not before he was elevated to the five-star rank of Admiral of the Fleet.
William D. Leahy
Adm. William Leahy in 1944. (80-G-43467)
In 1915, William D. Leahy was commanding the Dolphin, a dispatch gunboat, when he became friends with the assistant secretary of the Navy, Franklin D. Roosevelt, who cruised on the ship.
In April of 1918, Leahy got command of the Princess Matoika, which was transporting American troops to France. In the period between the wars, Leahy held a variety of posts within the Navy, culminating in his tenure as Chief of Naval Operations, then retirement. As a retiree, he was governor of Puerto Rico and ambassador to France.
In World War II, President Roosevelt brought him out of retirement as the first-ever chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and his own personal chief of staff. He became closer to Roosevelt and accompanied him to the Pacific Strategy Conference in Hawaii and at Yalta in 1945 with Winston Churchill and Joseph Stalin. He was promoted to Admiral of the Fleet in late 1944.
Douglas MacArthur
Brig. Gen. Douglas MacArthur near Bresmes, France, August 1918. (Cpl, R.H. Ingleston, 111-SC-18905)
Douglas MacArthur had already risen to the wartime rank of brigadier general in World War I and was chief of staff to the 42nd “Rainbow” Division, which was made up of men from more than two dozen states.
MacArthur did not shrink from battle and would often be seen leading his troops while other commanders were less conspicuous. His “battlefield bravery” in Europe would earn him two Distinguished Service Crosses and seven Silver Stars.
After the war, MacArthur returned to the United States as superintendent of the U.S. Military Academy at West Point and Army chief of staff. During World War II, he was the top Army commander in the Pacific, then supreme commander in Japan; he became a General of the Army (five stars) in late 1944.
During the Korean War in the early 1950s, he openly differed with the Truman administration on policy in Korea and was relieved of all his commands in 1951 by President Harry S. Truman.
George C. Marshall
Lt. Col. George C. Marshall in France in 1918. (111-SC-317917)
George Marshall made it to Europe during World War I as operations officer for the First Infantry Division. Although he begged for a combat assignment, he was told he was too valuable a staff officer to be sent into battle since he excelled at moving men and materiel.
Marshall would see the war from a desk, albeit not far from the battlefield. He earned high praise for his planning work in the battles of St. Mihiel, Picardy, and Cantigny.
After the war, Marshall spent five years as aide-de-camp to Pershing before his star started rising within the Army. He was assistant commandant of the infantry school at Fort Benning, Georgia, and held several other teaching and administrative jobs.
In 1936, Marshall was promoted to brigadier general after Pershing asked Roosevelt to put him on the generals list. Roosevelt became impressed with him and named him Army chief of staff in 1939 and jumped from one star to four stars as a general, passing over dozens of other generals lower in rank. In late 1944, he became a General of the Army (five stars).
He remained one of Roosevelt’s and Truman’s closest advisers throughout the remainder of the war and Truman’s term as President.
Chester W. Nimitz
During World War I, Chester W. Nimitz was busy in the Atlantic. He served as chief engineer of the Maumee, which was a refueling ship for U.S. Navy destroyers crossing the Atlantic and with which he conducted the first-ever underway refueling.
Nimitz was briefly an aide to the commander of the submarine force for the Atlantic Fleet before becoming the commander’s chief of staff.
Soon thereafter, he was assigned to the Board of Submarine Design as a senior member.
In World War II, he was commander-in-chief of the Pacific Fleet and of the Pacific Ocean areas. He was promoted to Admiral of the Fleet (five stars) in late 1944.
George S. Patton, Jr.
As a young lieutenant, George S. Patton, Jr., became interested in tank warfare and pushed it so successfully that he was assigned to establish a tank school after the United States joined the war in April 1917.
By the time World War II came around, Patton was a tank warfare expert and gained considerable ground for the Allies. Elements of his Third Army broke through enemy lines and rescued U.S. troops trapped at the Battle of the Bulge in the winter of 1944–1945.
Patton got himself into trouble at times, especially when he slapped two soldiers who suffered from battle fatigue and barely included the Russians on the list of countries that would be the major players on the world scene after the war. But when he equated Nazis in Germany to Democrats and Republicans at home, Eisenhower removed him from command of the Third Army.
Known as “Old Blood and Guts,” Patton died of injuries received in a car crash in December 1945 and is buried with his men in a cemetery in France.
Franklin D. Roosevelt
This photograph, taken in 1914 at the Brooklyn Navy Yard, shows Assistant Secretary of the Navy Franklin D. Roosevelt (see inset) in full stride inspecting progress on USS Battleship No. 39. This vessel eventually became the USS Arizona, now at the bottom of Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. (National Archives at New York, RG 181)
Franklin D. Roosevelt never wore a uniform and did not command men or ships, but he was President Woodrow Wilson’s assistant secretary of the Navy from 1913 to 1920.
It was a job his cousin Theodore had held on his way to becoming President, and Franklin figured it was a good route to take. As the Number 2 man in the Navy Department, he espoused policies that would raise the profile of the U.S. Navy.
He oversaw the buildup of the Navy itself, both in manpower and weaponry. He also worked with labor unions at shipyards—a job he did so well that there was not a single labor strike at a shipyard during his seven and one-half years as assistant secretary.
In 1918 Roosevelt went to Europe to check on naval installations. Although he was far from the battlefront, he was close enough for a sample. In his diary of the trip, he wrote “we passed on to the south slopes of Fort Douaumont, a quarter of a mile beyond, and sure enough the long whining whistle of a shell was followed by the dull boom and puff of smoke of the explosion at the Dead Man’s Corner we just left.”
Twenty-five years later, Roosevelt, by then using a wheelchair because of polio, would be meeting as President with Winston Churchill and Joseph Stalin at Tehran to plot their strategy to defeat Hitler’s Germany. He died just three months into his fourth term in 1945.
Harry S. Truman
Capt. Harry S. Truman photographed in France in 1918. (Truman Library)
While Roosevelt was the “visiting VIP” from Washington as assistant secretary of the Navy, the man who succeeded him in the presidency was much closer to the battlefront.
Harry S. Truman, who would always be “Captain Harry” to his troops, was leading an artillery company as commander of the 200-man Battery D, 129th Field Artillery, 35th Division.
Truman, whose eyesight was so bad that he memorized the eye chart so he could serve in the Army at age 33, took command of the battery after the 129th arrived at Camp Coëtquidan in Brittany in July 1918. The 129th then undertook a 100-mile march to its new location in the Argonne Forest and immediately faced five days of intense combat.
In his letters to future wife, Bess, he described what war was like. “There were some three or four weeks from September 10 to October 6 that I did nothing but march at night and shoot or sleep in daylight,” he wrote in one letter. In another, he said “I have just finished putting 1,800 shells over on the Germans in the last five hours. They don’t seem to have had enough energy to come back yet. I don’t think they will.”
As the war neared its end, the 129th was called to the battlefields of Verdun and continued to fire its last shots up until about 15 minutes before the armistice took effect on November 11, 1918.
Postscript
Although the name “Pershing” dominates the list of American commanders in World War I, the experience, however brief, gave future U.S. military leaders a real world introduction to war—on the front lines or at sea or back at headquarters.
Eisenhower, Truman, Roosevelt, Arnold, Halsey, Nimitz, MacArthur, King, Leahy, and Patton would get their turn in World War II, just a quarter century later.
Note on Sources
Much information exists on all of the leaders mentioned in this article.
This is especially true for the three men who became President of the United States. There are a number of first-rate biographies of Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry S. Truman, and Dwight D. Eisenhower as well as recollections by Truman and Eisenhower themselves.
The author wishes to thank staff at the Roosevelt, Truman, and Eisenhower Presidential Libraries for their assistance in finding photographs of these men taken during World War I and information about their experiences during the war.
Thanks also to Rutha Beamon and Kaitlyn Crain Enriquez of the National Archives Still Pictures Branch in College Park, Maryland, for researching images of other individuals in the Army and Navy. Thanks also to the National Archives in New York City for coming up with the rare photograph of Roosevelt in 1914 at the laying of the keel of battleship No. 39, which later became the USS Arizona.
Many books have been written about the individuals mentioned here. Besides biographies of the three future Presidents, Roosevelt, Truman, and Eisenhower, there are biographies of the other admirals and generals. In addition, The Admirals by Walter R. Borneman and The Generals by Winston Groom examine the careers, and how they intersect, of Generals Marshall, MacArthur, and Patton, and Admirals Leahy, King, Nimitz, and Halsey.
Also fascinating is a paper by Kevin Hymel for the 1997 annual meeting of the Society of Military History that examines the various accounts, including what was said and wasn’t said, of the battlefield meeting of MacArthur and Patton in 1918, just a few months before the war ended.
Articles published in Prologue do not necessarily represent the views of NARA or of any other agency of the United States Government.
It can be argued that the best tank is the one that destroys the enemy. Or, depending on your point of view, it's the one that isn't shooting at you.
But otherwise, choosing the top tank is always a nightmare of technical and historical analysis. There are so many variables, and so many experts and history buffs that will argue those variables to the death. Yet into the fray steps 'Armored Champions: The Top Tanks of World War II', written by Steven Zaloga, a defense analyst and well-regarded writer on World War II armored warfare.
So let's cut to the chase. What's the best tank of World War II?
Sorry, armor fans, but there isn't one! Zaloga wisely avoids the scholarly minefield of picking The Greatest Generation's Greatest Tank. 'A tank protected with 45-millimeter armor was invulnerable in 1941, but it was doomed to quick defeat by 1945,' he writes. 'A tank armed with a 76-millimeter gun was a world-beater in 1941, but by 1945 was a pop-gun in a tank-versus-tank duel.'
Instead, 'Armored Champion' hedges its bets by spreading them. Instead of one best tank for World War II, there is one best tank for each year of the war. More important is how the author tackles the vexing question of why the seemingly 'best' tanks so frequently belong to the losing side. For example, markedly inferior German armor decimated the Soviet tank fleet in 1941, while Israeli Super Shermans -- upgraded World War II leftovers -- destroyed modern Russian tanks in 1973.
Zaloga tackles this conundrum by picking two champions per year. The first he calls 'Tanker's Choice,' awarded to the vehicle that ranks highest according to the traditional yardsticks of firepower, armor and mobility. But the second he calls 'Commander's Choice,' which is based upon a tank's overall usefulness in light of factors such as reliability and quantity produced. Thus while Germany's legendary Tiger boasts more firepower and armor than the humble StuG III assault gun (a turretless tank with the gun stuck in the hull), 'the German army could have bought 10 StuG III assault guns or three Tiger tanks,' Zaloga writes. 'Factoring in reliability, the Wehrmacht could have had seven operational StuG IIIs or one operational Tiger tank.'
This choice of analysis produces some surprising results. French armor gets as much respect as Rodney Dangerfield, but in 1940, the Somua S-35 wins Tanker's Choice for its balance of armor, firepower and mobility. Yet the problem with the S-35 and many other early war Allied tanks was their two-man turret, where the tank commander was also responsible for firing the gun. This meant the tank commander couldn't keep his eyes on the battlefield, which in turn meant a lack of situational awareness and an inability to respond to changing battlefield conditions.
In contrast, the German Mark IV, with its low-velocity main gun, may have been inferior on paper. But it had a three-man turret with a designated gunner and loader, leaving the commander free to actually command the tank. Thus, the Mark IV wins Commander's Choice, because it was superior as a tool for winning battles.
Some of Zaloga's choices are less surprising. The only tank in 'Armored Champions' to receive both the Tanker's and Commander's prize is the T-34 in 1941. Despite a two-man turret, its superior firepower, armor and mobility shocked the hitherto-invincible German panzers, as well as German infantry terrified to see their anti-tank guns bounce off the T-34's thick skin. Some might object that the Germans decimated the Soviet tank fleet in 1941 anyway, but that was more a result of poorly trained tank crews, poor maintenance, and inept Soviet tactics. The T-34 wasn't a champion because it won battles in 1941, but rather because it kept the Soviets from losing worse than they did.
It is in 1943 that the contrast between technical capability and battlefield utility becomes most striking. Not surprisingly, the Tiger I is Tanker's Choice because of its thick armor and powerful gun, which created 'Tiger fright' among Allied troops. But Tigers were expensive, few in number (only 1,347 were built, compared to 84,000 T-34s) and hard to maintain. The depleted and desperate German infantry divisions on the Eastern Front needed armor support to stave off massed waves of T-34s, and a few battalions of overworked Tigers were not going to save them. It was the little StuG III assault gun, not much taller than a man, which saved the day. It was cheap, had decent armor and firepower, and stiffened the hard-pressed German infantry against the relentless Soviet offensives. Hence, the StuG III assault gun knocks out the Tiger for Commander's Choice.
In 1944, the German Panther, whose balance of firepower, protection and mobility influenced post-war Western tank design, wins on technical grounds, while the Soviet T-34/85 was most useful because of its solid capabilities coupled with large numbers flowing from the factories. If U.S. and British tanks seem strangely absent from their list, it was the mediocrity of models like the Sherman and the Cromwell that made it so. Though the British Matilda briefly ruled North Africa in 1940-41, and the Sherman was actually quite good when it debuted in 1942, it isn't until the war was nearly over that Western Allied tanks win plaudits. In 1945, the American M-26 Pershing edging out the formidable, but overweight and unreliable, German King Tiger for Tanker's Choice, while the Sherman model M4A3E8 wins Commander's Choice for its reliability, quantity and high-velocity armor-piercing ammunition.
Much of this material will be familiar to those who know something about tank design and armored warfare. But Zaloga has a knack for sneaking in various fascinating facts. For example, the T-34 had impressive specifications but serious reliability issues in the field: U.S. experts examining a 1942-model T-34 were shocked to discover that the life of the tank's diesel engine was only 72 hours, while the engine air filter was so poorly designed that motors could only survive a few hundred miles of dusty roads before they were finished (the Americans also discovered that the British Cromwell required 199 man-hours of maintenance compared to 39 for the M4A3).
Do historical rankings make a difference beyond mere curiosity? The answer is yes, for those wise enough to learn from history. The post-1945 U.S. military has been fond of cutting-edge weapons; if you could transport today's Pentagon back to 1943, it would doubtless choose to build Tigers instead of Shermans or T-34s.
At a time when the U.S. defense budget is grappling to pay for extremely expensive systems such as the F-35 fighter, it is worth remembering that a relatively minor design feature -- be it a two-man tank turret or a few bits of faulty software -- can make a profound difference in the actual effectiveness of a weapon. No matter how great it looks on paper.
Michael Peck, a frequent contributor to TNI, is a defense and historical writer based in Oregon. His work has appeared in Foreign Policy, WarIsBoring and many other fine publications. He can be found on Twitterand Facebook.
Image: Flickr/Contando Estrelas
![](/uploads/1/2/5/8/125853059/700301035.jpg)